The lawsuit was not paid until after Howe's death and a few weeks before the death of Forehand in 1898.
Howe asked Forehand to bring a lawsuit against the government, and eight years later the company won the suit on behalf of Howe with a judgement of $66,000. Howe had patented an ammunition cartridge in 1864, and the US government infringed upon this design in 1868 with the "Cup Anvil Cartridge" until the expiration of Howe's patent in 1881. Howe, against the United States government. The company was involved with a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of one of their employees, John C. : 604įorehand's sons ran the business for several years following the death of their father, then sold it in 1902 to Hopkins & Allen, who had been making Forehand Arms' revolvers under contract. Other offerings included derringers, : 381 rifles, : 560 and shotguns. The company manufactured a variety of black powder and cartridge revolvers, including several versions of the British Bull Dog revolver. In 1902, the company was acquired by Hopkins and Allen. It operated under the name Forehand Arms Company until the death of Sullivan Forehand in 1898. In 1890, Henry Wadsworth retired, and the company name was changed to Forehand Arms Company. įrom 1871-1890, the firm was known as Forehand and Wadsworth.
Wadsworth sold his share of the company to Forehand in 1890 in order to retire, and the company was rebranded as Forehand Arms. Wadsworth founded Forehand & Wadsworth from the remnants of Ethan Allen & Company after the death of their father-in-law, Ethan Allen. Which hints that these particular revolver (made between 18) generated some income.Īs side note: due to relatively low production (compared to S&W and Colt revolver) these marked Merwin and Hulbert today are prized collectors items.In 1871, Sullivan Forehand and Henry C. During 1880–1881, Merwin and Hulbert was in receivership, but it was able to recover. Manufacturer sadly eventually went bankrupt, but it is worth noted that earlier, according to Ī company associate literally stole the firm’s operating capital and disappeared. I think they might be called “1870s high-tech”.
Moreover, they were designed, so that spent cases only (not complete cartridge) were thrown away when it was opened for reloading. 3 and Colt Peacemaker, but distinguished from them by possessing ability to quickly swap barrels, allowing user to swap between short and long one effortlessly. Interesting comparison might be with Merwin Hulbert revolvers: Honestly, I do not see any outstanding features which would made it highly desirable by 1870s clients. That is example that direct scaling might be often not viable path and also that to attain commercial success you need to find at least one niche for your invention. Note that such engine were made in small size – bigger one would probably be problematic sealing-wise. 44-40 was introduced in 1878, but this also failed to gain any significant traction in the market.įor explanation how it works see 4th image from top: A slightly improved version chambered for. Ultimately, the gun simply could not compete with the superior Colt and Smith & Wesson offerings, and less than a thousand would be made in total.
#Forehand and wadsworth revolver manual
Single action only, with a 6-shot cylinder and a rather weak and clumsy manual ejector rod. It was a 2.5 lb gun with a 7.5 inch barrel, chambered for the. In 1873 they decided to compete in the service revolver arena, releasing the Army model we see here today. 38 pocket revolvers, which they made a quiet large number of. Forehand was a particularly hard worker, and when Allen also passed away in 1871, the company again changed names to Forehand & Wadsworth. When Wheelock died in 1863, the two were made partners in the firm, which became Ethan Allen & Co. It evolved from Allen & Wheelock, with Sullivan Forehand and Henry Wadsworth both having married daughters of Ethan Allen. The Forehand & Wadsworth company was a better firearms manufacturer than most people tend to give them credit for.
0 kommentar(er)
